• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Christian News Now

Christian News Now

News for the Thinking Christian

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • World
  • Church
  • Faith
  • Tech & Science
  • Family
  • Entertainment
  • Sports

Bill Would Remove ‘Conscience’ as Basis for Refusing Vaccine

October 27, 2021 by Staff

By JOHN O’CONNOR AP Political Writer

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) Illinois law has for more than four decades protected those who oppose providing or receiving medical treatment because of their religious beliefs. Now Democrats want an exception to allow repercussions for those who refuse vaccinations in the battle against COVID-19.

Long considered a shield for physicians whose religious beliefs precluded their performing abortions, the Illinois Health Care Right of Conscience Act has become a pandemic lightning rod. Lawsuits invoking it are challenging employers trying to enforce rules requiring testing for or inoculation against the coronavirus.

“The Health Care Right of Conscience Act was never intended to cover a pandemic where we’re trying to keep people alive,” Gov. J.B. Pritzker, a Democrat, said after a news conference in Springfield Wednesday.

The law states that Illinois will “ respect and protect the right of conscience of all persons who refuse to obtain, receive or accept” medical care as well as those providing it. It prohibits repercussions against anyone for “refusing to act contrary to their conscience.”

Rep. Robyn Gabel, an Evanston Democrat, calls her proposed COVID-19 carve-out a “clarification.” Proponents say it doesn’t require vaccination, just bars right of conscience as a reason for refusal.

Republicans challenged Gabel in debate during committee action this week that sent the proposal to the House floor for a vote as early as Wednesday, the next-to-last day of the Legislature’s fall session.

“At what point does the government stop telling people they can’t take their health care into their own hands?” asked Republican Rep. C.D. Davidsmeyer, noting that if diagnosed with cancer, he could refuse prescribed chemotherapy.

“That doesn’t affect all these other people around you,” Gabel replied. “That’s not a communicable disease. We are doing this to address a communicable disease that has worldwide impact.”

Filed Under: Tech & Science

Primary Sidebar

Trending News

In SBC Presidential Address, Clint Pressley Calls Southern Baptists To ‘Walk Worthy’

Albert Mohler Officially Proposes SBC Constitutional Amendment To Ban Women Pastors

Why Latter-day Saints Aren’t Christians: Allie Beth Stuckey Responds to Sen. Mike Lee

Apologist John Lennox’s ‘Peace and Contentment’ Is the Most Compelling Argument for God, Says Steven Bartlett

RSS ChurchLeaders

  • 10 Signs You’re Attending a Good Church
  • Willy Rice Elected as New President of Southern Baptist Convention

RSS Faithit

  • The Emotional Cost of Being the ‘Strong One’
  • Dad’s Hectic Flight with Infant Takes Heartwarming Turn Thanks to Kind Stranger

RSS ForEveryMom

  • Couple Hides $1K Cash Inside Baby Products at Target to Help New Parents and Spread Kindness
  • Billie Eilish Says She Started Watching Porn at 11: ‘It Really Destroyed My Brain’

Footer

About Us
Privacy Statement
Terms and Conditions
Cookie Settings
Contact Us
Newsletter

Images used on christiannewsnow.com are licensed from stock photography providers including Shutterstock, Getty Images, iStock, Unsplash, and other licensed contributors, or are used with permission. Individual image credits are available upon request.

Search

Copyright © 2026 · Christian News Now